“In the Age of AI, Are We Losing the Right to Say ‘Wait’?”

Inside the auditorium of the Asian Institute of Management, Joseph Plazo—AI investor and founder of Plazo Sullivan Roche Capital—delivered not predictions, but a pointed pause.

MANILA — the atmosphere inside AIM’s lecture hall was not electric, but charged—with thought.

Plazo, a man whose trading systems are trusted by institutional investors across continents and have posted almost mechanical consistency, did not arrive to dazzle.

“Delegating decisions doesn’t absolve responsibility.”

???? **The Code Breaker Who Stopped to Ask Why**

He doesn’t throw stones from the sidelines. He shaped the system that now dominates.

Which makes his unease all the more compelling.

“Optimisation is a tool, not a compass.”

He referenced an early pandemic incident: an AI under his firm flagged a short trade on gold—right before central bank intervention reversed market expectations.

“We stopped it. It crunched numbers, not nuance.”

???? **Delay Isn’t a Bug. It’s a Human Feature.**

Plazo warned against the growing cultural obsession with speed—particularly in finance.

“Delay isn’t inefficiency—it’s responsibility.”

He introduced a three-question model he calls **Conviction Calculus**—a checklist not for technical performance, but for ethical clarity:

- Is this trade aligned with the values of the firm—or just its ambition?
- Is this merely a technical position—or a real-world one?
- Who takes responsibility if the outcome is devastating, but the logic was perfect?

???? **Asia’s AI Boom—and the Accountability Gap**

Across Asia, AI and fintech are racing ahead—with minimal restraint.

Plazo asked a harder question: “We’re expanding capacity, not responsibility.”

AI models executed flawlessly—right into catastrophe.

“The systems are functional—but are they wise?”

???? **Trading Tools That Can Read the World, Not Just the Market**

Plazo isn’t calling for a retreat from technology.

He is instead building what he terms **“narrative-integrated AI”**—systems read more that assess not just numbers, but context, tone, and geopolitical undercurrents.

“A good algorithm predicts price. A better one understands pattern. The best? Purpose.”

The idea drew immediate attention.

One called the model:

“A desperately needed alternative to automation without conscience.”

???? **Final Line: The Crash That Won’t Be Loud**

Plazo closed with a sentence that now circles boardrooms like a quiet echo:

“The next crash won’t be emotional. It will be rational—executed too quickly, without dissent.”

Not fear. Foresight.

Because we built the machines. But we still write the stories.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *